The Illusion of “Authenticity”: Ethical Dilemmas and Aesthetic Imagination in Pop Music Creation in the Age of AI

Authors

  • Sitan Yang Sejong University,South korea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71113/JCAC.v1i1.302

Keywords:

AI Music, Vocal Authenticity, Originality, Aesthetic Imagination

Abstract

With the widespread application of artificial intelligence (AI) in music creation, the creative logic, aesthetic paradigms, and power structures of pop music are undergoing profound transformations. This paper takes AI-generated music as its research focus, examining the controversies surrounding its generative mechanisms, aesthetic presentation, copyright ethics, and social practices. Drawing on real-world international research findings and policy documents, it explores the future of human-machine collaboration. The study finds that while AI can enhance creative efficiency, it also poses serious challenges to originality, authorship, and emotional authenticity. Constructing an ethical framework and rights recognition system adapted to the AI context is an urgent issue that demands scholarly attention and practical resolution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]Reed, R. (2023, April 20). The Drake AI song is just the tip of the iceberg. *Time*.

[2]Corbelli, A. (2024). Beyond the algorithm: Ethical and aesthetic challenges of AI in music. *Itinera*, (28), 45–62.

[3]Gordon, C. (2023, January 31). AI ethical risks in the music industry are accelerating and we are not ready for what is coming our way. *Forbes*.

[4]OECD. (2023). In tune with ethics: Responsible artificial intelligence and the music industry.

[5]Soundful. (2023). Ethical considerations on AI music.

[6]Samuelson, P. (2023). Generative AI meets copyright. *Science, 381*(6656), 144–145.

[7]Dhariwal, P., Jun, H., Payne, C., Kim, J. W., Radford, A., & Sutskever, I. (2020). Jukebox: A generative model for music.

[8]Agostinelli, A., Anil, R., Castro, P. S., et al. (2023). MusicLM: Generating music from text. *arXiv preprint* arXiv:2301.11325.

[9]Huang, C. A., Vaswani, A., Uszkoreit, J., et al. (2018). Music Transformer: Generating music with long-term structure. *arXiv preprint* arXiv:1809.04281.

[10]Huang, Q., Park, D. S., Wang, T., et al. (2023). Noise2Music: Text-conditioned music generation with diffusion models. *arXiv preprint* arXiv:2302.03917.

[11]Cifka, O., & Gelly, G. (2020). Groove2Groove: One-shot music style transfer with supervision from synthetic data. *IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 28*, 2638–2650.

[12]Barnett, J. (2023). The ethical implications of generative audio models: A systematic literature review. *arXiv preprint* arXiv:2307.05527.

[13]The Cornell Daily Sun. (2024, December). The problem with AI-generated music.

[14]The Guardian. (2024, April 13). Suno AI can generate power ballads about coffee – and jingles for the Guardian.

[15]Babu, S., Jha, N., & Gomez, E. (2023). Do Listeners Feel the Same? Evaluating Perceived Emotion in AI vs. Human-Composed Music. Proceedings of the 24th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR).

[16]Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and Simulation (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1981)

[17]Cunningham, S. (2024). Artificial Authorship and the Illusion of Authenticity in AI-Composed Music. Journal of Media Ethics and Aesthetics, 18(1), 22–35.

[18]Hesmondhalgh, D., Jones, M., & Brennan, M. (2019). Cultural Work and the Crisis of Authenticity in the Age of Automation. Popular Music Studies, 31(2), 105–122.

[19]Kang, Y., Choi, S., & Lee, J. (2023). Emotion Recognition and Generation in AI Music Systems: A Review of Methods and Challenges. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 19(3), Article 45.

[20]Krause, A. E., North, A. C., & Hewitt, L. Y. (2022). Knowing the Composer Is AI Affects Perceived Value of Music. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 16(4), 563–572.

[21]Samuelson, P. (2023). Generative AI meets copyright. Science, 381(6656), 144–145.

[22]Clifford Chance. (2023). AI-Generated Music and Copyright.

[23]The Guardian. (2025, May 10). Paul McCartney and Dua Lipa among artists urging Starmer to rethink AI copyright plans.

[24]U.S. Copyright Office. (2025). Copyright Registration Guidance for Works Containing AI-Generated Material.

[25]Gordon, S., Mahari, R., Mishra, M., & Epstein, Z. (2022). Co-creation and ownership for AI radio. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.00485.

[26]Hacker, P., Mittelstadt, B., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., & Wachter, S. (2024). Generative Discrimination: What Happens When Generative AI Exhibits Bias, and What Can Be Done About It. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10329.

[27]Federal Trade Commission. (2024). The Price of Emotion: Privacy, Manipulation, and Bias in Emotional AI.

[28]Samuelson, P. (2023). Generative AI meets copyright. Science, 381(6656), 144–145.

[29]OECD. (2023). In tune with ethics: Responsible artificial intelligence and the music industry.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-11

How to Cite

Yang, S. (2025). The Illusion of “Authenticity”: Ethical Dilemmas and Aesthetic Imagination in Pop Music Creation in the Age of AI. Journal of Contemporary Art Criticism, 1(1), 28–31. https://doi.org/10.71113/JCAC.v1i1.302

Issue

Section

Articles